Are Feminine Hygiene Products Safe?
A typical lady goes through over twelve,000 hygienical pads or tampons over the decades that she has her amount.
But is long-term use of sanitary protection safe?
Members of Congress and women’s health support teams have raised issues a few lacks of analysis into the security of tampons, pads, and different female hygiene merchandise like douches.
“The reality is catamenial health has been thought-about a taboo subject for too long,” Rep.
Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, says in an email. “It’s time that female hygiene merchandise square measure completely researched in order that we will make sure that complete and correct data is being collected and created promptly accessible.”
U.S. sales of tampons and sanitary pads totaled $3 billion last year, according to a report by Euromonitor International.
Product manufacturers and therefore the authority say hygienical and female hygiene merchandise square measure safe because they contain either no risky chemicals or only trace amounts.
But Maloney and different women’s health advocates argue that nobody will be certain, because studies of their effects over a woman’s lifetime haven’t been done.
Meanwhile, a political candidate with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) says agency scientists square measure operating with the independent agency to appear at chemicals of concern in aid merchandise such as tampons and pads.
Philip Tierno, Jr., Ph.D., a clinical professor of microbiology and pathology at the NYU School of Medicine, has long studied the microorganisms that live in the vagina and the workings of toxic shock syndrome, a rare, potentially fatal condition that is linked to the use of highly absorbent tampons.
“Women assume that the authority or different bodies have checked out the matter, and, therefore, whatever product is on the market is safe,” Tierno says.
“And that’s incorrect.”
Approximately forty-three million ladies within us use tampons.
Millions more use sanitary napkins.
These female hygiene merchandise square measure typically made from cotton or a mix of cotton and textile for permeableness. Rayon could be a polyose fiber made up of pulp.
Until the late Nineteen Nineties, the cotton and/or rayon used to make the tampons were bleached with elemental chlorine gas which was known to leave dioxin residues.
Dioxin is a pervasive environmental contaminant and a known human carcinogen. It accumulates in body fat over time with repeated exposure. The use of those hydrocarbon laced fibers within the manufacture of disposable female hygiene merchandise caused several ladies and ladies to inadvertently enable malignant neoplastic disease toxins to return into contact with the skinny and delicate tissues of their feminine fruitful organs, month after month, year after year.
Is the hydrocarbon very and really gone with these new bleaching methods?
The FDA reports that dioxin can “theoretically” be created with chlorine-free bleaching. In practice, however, it appears dioxin is still very much present. A study sponsored by the authority workplace of Women’s Health revealed in 2005, found “detectable levels of dioxin in seven brands of tampons,” including at least one 100 percent cotton brand.
Dioxin Exposure Directly Correlated with Development of Endometriosis
Endometriosis was found to be directly correlated with dioxin exposure in a colony of rhesus monkeys chronically exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD or dioxin) for a period of 4 years.
Ten years when termination of hydrocarbon treatment, the presence of endometriosis was documented by surgical laparoscopy.
With endometriosis rates soaring in young women, one has to wonder if chronic exposure to low levels of dioxin residues from sanitary products could partly be to blame?
Chlorine Dioxide is a Pesticide
Even if dioxin is mostly gone using these newer bleaching methods, another problem emerges in the manufacturing process for tampons and sanitary napkins.
While totally chlorine-free bleaching with oxygen or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) appears safe, the use of chlorine dioxide is likely not. While chlorine dioxide smells somewhat like chlorine bleach, it should not be confused with elemental chlorine gas. They are two distinct chemicals that react differently and produce by-products that have little in common.
Chlorine dioxide is an antimicrobial pesticide that has been used for its disinfectant properties since the early 1900s. Microbes are killed by chlorine dioxide via disruption of nutrients across the cell wall.
Chlorine dioxide was one of the pesticides used as part of the federal decontamination response to the anthrax spore bioterrorism attacks of October 2001.
So, whereas hydrocarbon residue could doubtless not be a tangle for hygienical merchandise, chemical residues square measure.
One problem replaced with another as is frequently the case with industrially manufactured products!